Pagan Wedding Hairstyle

- Beds are burning - Tck Tck Tck (Climate Justice)



Peruvian Artists join global campaign against climate change

released song and video "The Time is Now"

announced big free concert for Thursday 10
December


Cecilia Bracamonte William Luna, Ernesto Pimentel, Carmina Cannavino, Elsa Maria Elejalde, Pepe Vasquez, Daniel F, Elsa María Elejalde, Rafo Ráez, Jorge Pardo, Julio Andrade and María del Carmen Dongo today introduced the video "The Time is Now", along with MOCICC and representatives of Oxfam International. Peruvian

The video, produced by Maia Films, is an adaptation of the classic "Beds are Burning" by the Australian group Midnight Oil, and is part of the global campaign "Tck tck tck Time for Climate Justice" is demanding that world leaders meeting in Copenhagen decisions to curb global warming. In the song also participate Brenda Mau (second in the English contest Idol this year), Damaris (winner of the Silver Gull in 2008 the Festival of Viña del Mar), Julio Perez de la Sarita, Julie Freundt and Patricia Saravia.

artists also announced that will give a free concert on Thursday December 10 at 6:30 pm in the Great Park of Lima where he will also attend La Sarita, Jean Paul Strauss, Claudia and Pilar Dammert to Hoz. They involve about 20 artists on stage and become a human clock with attendees Copenhagen to signal that time is running out. Renowned percussionist

María del Carmen Dongo has been in charge of recording of the song and the concert. "At first I took this call a little scared because it was in Peru to the world, but I decided to be very quiet and rest assured that the sound came Peru, Peruvian voices then, and then Peruvian souls. We live in a country with so much talent and wanted to introduce the artists to do jazz, they do rock, they do boleros, ballads that make that make folklore. I wanted to join them to say that Peru has varied voices, different colors, because that is Peru, a colorful country, "he said while thanking Lucho Quequezana their participation in the implementation of Andean instruments, Pedro Luis Pacora who took charge of the realization, Dante Luza Maia Films who produced the video, and Milagros Salazar and Cynthia Galicia who composed the lyrics.

"We have done this thinking in our people, but especially on our planet that is our home. Hopefully, with this country aware of what happens in the world and we can appease what is upon us, "said Cecilia Bracamonte.

"I'm glad finally to know that Peru is saying tackle this problem, and I am glad to participate to our leaders claim for compensation to people suffering from climate change, almost not advertised in newspapers what happens " Carmina said Cannavino, Peruvian singer-songwriter based in Mexico.

William Luna, who plays a beautiful verse in Quechua with Damaris Patricia Saravia and remarked that the video is to create justice and have the largest polluters pay the costs that this brings. "We must pay attention to what's going on: in recent years have lost 80 thousand hectares of potatoes. I am Cusco, I grew up in a place where there were springs, and no. In a place where there toads colors, no more. Was normal to find frogs croaking in the woods, now no longer exist. "

"I hope the video will serve to sensitize some people within their own homes, to begin to care for the environment. There are so many things that can help. We should not wait for the government, only leaders to do something, "said Elsa María Elejalde.

"The idea is to force you to take deals this year in Copenhagen, and those who exploit the land more pay more for it. The idea is that we are aware that touches me, happens to me, I can do something, "he said Ernesto Pimentel said while they will be hosting the free concert will take place on Thursday December 10 at 6: 30 pm in the Gran Parque de Lima and encouraged everyone to participate.

"We want to send the idea that time is running out and that the Heads of State must be to rise to the occasion, "he said Frank Boeren Oxfam, noting that this is vital for citizens to act. Rocío

Valdeavellano, coordinator of the Citizens Movement Against Climate Change (MOCICC) welcomed the participation of artists. "We are a new movement that has emerged in Peru because climate change concerns us all and can not be indifferent to it. As a citizen movement are putting our eyes in Copenhagen, at stake is the future of our home that is earth. We deeply appreciate the involvement of artists think that if they are participating because the battle will be won over who can get people to the artists? "he said.



LINK TO SEE THE VIDEO FROM 5:30 PM: http://eltiempoeshoy-justiciaclimatica.blogspot.com
artists
Contact: Tel: 997107829
Prieto Amparo
Contact the MOCICC: Derry Diaz Tel 985814469
Oxfam
Contact: Celia Aldana Tel 997372499

Abdominal Pain Ten Weeks Pregnant

piracy protection without limits: I also show each

"If aclarlo become clear that" words of Prime Minister Zapatero on all the controversy created around the draft Law on Sustainable Economy in its first final provision.

This first final provision amending Law 34/2002 on Information Society and the Royal Decree 1 / 1996 on approving the revised text of the Intellectual Property Law, verbatim, to protect intellectual property against piracy on the Internet.

I read everything that they say violates and I read that final disposition and no doubt there are many dark areas:

"2 . Bodies for the adoption of measures referred to in the preceding paragraph, in order to identify the responsible service of the Information Society being done by the conduct alleged violations, may require providers of information society communication of data allowing such identification to enable him to appear in the proceedings . Providers are required to provide the information they hold. "

This rule is pretty scary as how do you identify the person responsible? Where is the line? What about privacy?

And most importantly, who will decide and on what basis? Unfortunately the latter also has an answer:

"1. be created in the Ministry of Culture, Intellectual Property Commission, as a body at national level, to exercise the functions of mediation and arbitration and to safeguard the intellectual property rights assigned by this Act . "

There

is the stock of the matter: a Commission established by the Ministry of Culture (government body, the Executive) who can make decisions such as closing the web pages. But what web pages? The reform says "service providers" than this, as I was clear, and I understand that service is anyone who has a website, I have searched and, according to David Bravo specializing in computer law, concerns "Any website that you get some economic return, however minimal, like a blog with advertising."

Zapatero was quick to say that will not close access to users, but the Minister of Culture has again reiterated that the decision for the Commission on Intellectual Property. And this brings us back to the key point: Can a committee appointed by a ministry close websites, access to the Internet? Can get to know a Commission on the legality of a website? Can a judge this Commission?

The answer is clear: No. danger, yes, our rights are endangered if a commission can now decide if a page is acting lawfully or not. If a committee can judge now.

is clear: the English Constitution states in Article 117. 3 that "The exercise of judicial power in all sorts of processes, ruling and having judgments executed belongs exclusively to the Courts determined by the laws, according to competition rules and procedure established therein."

It's funny that you as a condition for the Commission between a know the will of at least one of the parties, of course, a key requirement of our rights and insurance. Sure Ramoncín will think twice, "oh, I go: to the courts are very slow and with its laws and doctrines sure do not solve anything or a Commission that has been my colleague Minister expressly to protect my Copyright? "I think it's too light.

As for the discussion of piracy is something that could devote a separate post artists should they charge for every time you use or product? Journalists sell produce a text that is published and do not ever see a penny for their product, but the same text has spread in half in two, three and different media. Should not they may focus on providing (good) concert? I recently read a study saying that artists to earn more profits from the concerts with record sales, and it seemed rather curious. Besides, do not we also pay a fee?. Already pages in which artists offer free downloads, why some and not others?

But focusing again on the subject, I scale of this is that a Commission has such broad powers (to judge!) and that this is in reality to avoid the cumbersome way of the courts and the authors can see their cherished right protected more quickly, and that there is no other topics that judicial slowness is also exasperating. I scale the canon, the Commission judging and (especially) the lack of information (while some say it will not close certain sites and others say it will).

But above all, it scares me put so many barriers to Internet freedom.

Therefore I also each

Manifesto "In defense of fundamental rights on the Internet"


Given the inclusion in the Draft Sustainable Economy Act legislative changes affecting the free exercise of freedom of expression, information and the right of access to culture through the Internet, journalists, bloggers, users, professionals and Internet developers express our firm opposition to the project , and declare that ...

1 .- The copyright can not be above the fundamental rights of citizens, including the right to privacy, security, presumption of innocence, judicial protection effective and freedom of expression.

2 .- The suspension of fundamental rights is and must remain the exclusive competence of the judiciary. Not a close without trial. This blueprint, contrary to the provisions of Article 20.5 of the Constitution, put in the hands of a non-judicial body - a body under the Ministry of Culture - the power of English citizens prevent access to any website.

3 .- The new legislation will create legal uncertainty around the English technology sector, damaging one of the few areas of development and future of our economy, hindering the creation of enterprises by introducing barriers to competition and slowing its international expansion.

4 .- The new proposed legislation threatens to hinder new creators and cultural creation. With The Internet and advances in technology have democratized the creation and publication of contents of any kind, no longer come predominantly from the traditional cultural industries, but from many different sources.

5 .- The authors, like all workers are entitled to live out of their creative ideas, business models and activities associated with their creations. Trying to hold legislative changes to an outdated industry that can adapt to this new environment is neither fair nor realistic. If your business model is based on the control of the copies of the works and the Internet is not possible without violating fundamental rights, should find another model.

6 .- We believe that cultural industries need to survive modern alternatives, effective, credible and affordable to suit new social practices, rather than limitations so disproportionate as to be ineffective in that they are pursuing.

7 .- Internet should function freely and without interference from groups that seek to perpetuate outdated business models and make it impossible for human knowledge remains free.

8 .- We ask the Government to guarantee by law the net neutrality in Spain, to any pressure that may occur as a framework for developing a sustainable economy for the future.

9 .- We propose a real reform of intellectual property rights aimed at an end: return to the society of knowledge, promote the public domain and limit abuses of management entities.

10 .- In a democracy, laws and amendments should be adopted after due debate and consultation with all parties involved. It is unacceptable that legislative changes are made that affect rights fundamental organic no law that deals with other matters.

This manifesto, drawn up jointly by several authors, is all and none. If you want to join it, spread it over the Internet.

Best Brazilian Intercourse

The other muro: sobre vergüenzas, pesadillas, y libertades que nunca llegan al Sahara

only a few months ago we celebrated the twentieth anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Everyone we gave pats on the back and smiled at the breakthrough which led the event. However, it appears that few remember (or even know) that there is another wall, a wall also divides a village, a wall that marks the difference between freedom and occupation.

is a 2,720 km wall that has existed since 1984, protected by anti-personnel mines and an army, the Moroccan army. This perfectly fulfills its role wall separates the Sahara to those found in the liberated territory of those who are abducted from their home. Thanks to reporting The wall of shame held in the portal saharalibre.es we know of its existence. I'll just quote these powerful words to describe it:

The wall of shame:

the world what NOT SEE,

what Morocco NOT WANT TO SEE,

what the government of Spain not see,

what United Nations failed to see,

what free citizens MUST SEE.

This wall is just a sample of a nightmare, but for many it is a reality for other half is quite real, is the story of the Saharawi people.

few months ago I had the opportunity to make an interview with a Saharawi that showed for the freedom of his people, and explained their struggle. Now, I remind the story that continues with no solution, there is a town that only calls for a referendum to show that wants to be free. That just begs to be free. Only.

José Saramago said in his letter to Haidar quite correctly that this is not humanitarianism "United Nations resolutions, international law and common sense are on one side, and in Morocco and Spain is known.. "

It is known, but unfortunately nothing is done.

is shocking and deeply offensive to international law to know that there are numerous United Nations resolutions in which the Saharawi people granted the right to self-determination and independence and that, nevertheless, not yet be recognized. Already in 1960 with UN resolution 1514 included the Saharawi people between colonized peoples and free. In 1975 the International Court of Justice in The Hague ruled that Western Sahara's sovereignty has no ties with Morocco. In 1985 the Decolonization Committee reintroduced the determination of the Saharawi people. I could go on giving dates each more daunting. This is a story of awards, resolutions, decisions and recommendations that have gone unnoticed (with more pain than glory, really) down the road toward freedom of the Saharawi people.

Today as usual, same or worse. The recent history of Aminatou Haidar, an activist for free to Sahara were expelled on 14 November Laayoune imposed for denying the Moroccan nationality, reminds us of this sad reality. Aminatou Haidar is in a dire situation, living in the Canary airport, decided to return to his people to continue struggle. JOINING Many are limited to her to take the photo and say they are outraged, as in the present case the BNG . Although more is still reportable action from the English Government, which has been accused of Aminatou Haidar treating unworthily after withdrawing his passport and the only solution to offer English nationality. Many others are those who have teamed up to bring Haidar support from lawyers and politicians to actors like Willy Toledo, but little is actually done.

Knowing all this when we stop to fill his mouth saying that the Saharawi people have freedom and self-determination is recognized and when you actually recognize?. In practice, when will it be free?, Why things are so, how many years it will take to be truly free the people who have already suffered enough? How much longer will the English government as washing your hands?

Needless to say, the Sahara is a rich land to which Morocco is interested in owning, but who else cares that this situation continues? Maybe that is the key.

Saramago

As I do not consider myself anything separatist, as I believe, like him, that the planet belongs to everyone, and, most importantly, that people are worth more than a piece of land. But this, in principle so basic and obvious, it seems that many people forget, to the detriment of other interests unfortunate
This story, like many others (known and silenced), it is our shame.