Accuracy Of An Hiv Test At Three Months

SGAE: is this where you have to pay for listening to the radio?

suppose you have heard the last of the sgaeghhghgh (read arch tone, thank you) to collect twelve euros monthly to hairdressers to put the radio (yes). Well, quick update today (at exam time everything is allowed) to put a video program Buenafuente in which the fabulous Anne Morgan posing as a hairdresser and owner of the Sgaerghasjk calls (I can not help it, really ), this is what cool people call it a must see .

Retirement Lady Cartoons

"Hey, it's not all fit here!"

The latest statements on the controversial decision not to register to vote undocumented immigrants Vic City Council, has caused me gag (and the whole thing in general, so we're going to go with nonsense .) Specifically, have repeated the phrase "no hi cap tothom to catalunya, not to espanya tothom cap," said the campaign already xenophobic Duran i Lleida , current CiU spokesman for more than a year, to justify those that one day they came to Spain to escape the misery of their countries, or simply because they felt the real gains, they can not enjoy basic rights because Hey, is not for everyone!.

is no longer the decision not registered contrary to the law which, incidentally, clearly states in Article 15 that

" Anyone living in Spain is obliged to register with the Register of the municipality in which they habitually resident .(...) Resident status is acquired at the same time of registration in the Register "which is a measure is completely xenophobic nature, tinged with the most right-wing stinking.

But why Why is registration so important? Basically, and down a little reading of the Act because:

"The rights and duties of the residents: Use according to their nature, municipal utilities, and access to communal land use, according to the rules. " In accessing social services need to be registered.

Services, by the way, as basic as healthcare. But do not worry, if there are no resources for a paperless not die for nothing. Yesterday, in the program The Great Intermediate Wyoming, was heard a statement by a listener esradio saying that it seemed fatal, immigrants who came pregnant before they are attended to expectant mothers here. Is to lie to laugh, or mourn.

Incidentally, in the same article of the rights of residents registered there is this "help with economic and personal benefits provided to legally conduct of municipal powers."

But that does not matter, have come here to deal, to steal, to take advantage of us poor hard workers españolitos we do know what suffering is.

the conclusion will be brief because I have only one thing to say: I agree. Yes, I agree, that do not fit all.

certainly not all fit, in fact, I hope that this situation is resolved soon because I think something horrible, disgusting and unbearable having to live with scum like that. Riffraff of the most ancient right that does not understand that people are all born where they are born equal and we all have rights to education, health, and directly, to live in the country it is.

Undoubtedly, the xenophobic fascists like the people who supported the motion to vic, and all that clap it does not fit.

Sony Dvp Sr200p Unlock Region

IS ALL TO HELP TAKE ...

And to help all children of this world. For all may have the same possibilities!.

Dear Tomi ... I did this video with much love, thinking about what you need and to achieve that soon!

(Stop the music player before watching the video)

Circuit For Analog Body Temperature Measurement

When parents are the first homophobic: Who is sick here?

Today newspaper El Levante-EMV, has published a story about another sector of society that do not leave the Amario: parents of homosexuals. What about what we could talk about these parents? Why is there something to talk about ?
Well, the news is the existence of the Association of Parents of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender (also known as ampgyl ) dedicated to helping parents of teens and young gay men to accept reality, chipboard and normal of their children.

An association says the news has already helped over two years to 240 families. 240 families in which parents themselves believe that homosexuality is a problem.

The Association itself is nothing objectionable, and that basically it aims to help, and while serving to help young people who have a homophobic family, it is welcome. The stinky, libelous, sad and deeply regrettable you HAVE to be something, because there are still people who believe that homosexuality is a problem.

This statement by one of the parents belonging to this association is particularly abhorrent and shows the true reason for this association:

"Although my husband and I had accepted intellectually the issue of homosexuality, we were squashed because everything you is not normal life difficult. however, began to take on contact with the association and share the issue with others in the same situation. "

Who says homosexuality is not normal? Why there must be a partnership like this? Is there an association of heterosexual parents?

gives me chills need to "share the matter with people in the same situation." What situation? Is that your son is in love with a man? That your daughter is happy with a woman?

gives me chills, disgust and fear have to be an association like this, as if having a gay son was a problem, like parents who have to deal with a disease that must fight and against which they must join forces.

What the hell is wrong with this shit of society there must be something? My parents did not have to go to an association when I had my first boyfriend, should have done instead if it had been a girlfriend? If it was a love, what's the difference?

When are these parents who feel they must unite to face a "situation", when it will change the mind of this sick society?. Because patients are those who think love is something wrong. They do need to be in a partnership. Moreover there should be (if not already exist), an association of homophobic parents.

That these do have a problem. And very serious.

In this video, the fabulous (and for me, supreme god) critical-comedian Enrique Pinti makes clear, "as can be so ignorant bastard, if the only thing that matters is that wonderful feeling, love " and" The only normal couple is what we love, the rest is shit . And if anyone still does not understand, you look at it.

Ontario Mills Jc Penney

The Financing of the Catholic Church, why do we keep giving little money?

this

Does that sound?

all know the famous box of income to allocate a percentage of personal income tax for the Catholic Church, but what is it exactly? Where did he come from? and what is more important Why is that?

Let's start at the beginning, the 1978 Constitution. When approved, Spain emerged from a model of state-confessional religious groups which had a standard, the 1953 Concordat, which regulated the state's commitment to subsidize the clergy and the worship of the Catholic Church. How? Expenditures (all) of the clergy and worship are paid by the State. Thus, moving from a model in which the Franco regime was paid to "make ends meet" all spent by the Church, to another, different.

The change is reflected in the Agreement of Economic Affairs of January 3, 1979. and there was basically because the expense of the church could not sustain in a state that combines the principle of secularism (understood as state neutrality in religious matters) and cooperation.

Thus, the State informed the Church that will reduce gradually their relationship: the state wants to go to the neutrality of a gradual way, which is manifested in three phases, and in which the Church is committed to achieving self-financing (which is still trying ...).

Therefore, to achieve this goal of self-financing will be three stages in this agreement:

The first phase was that, for some years, applied prespuestaria allocation system, ie it is funded directly by an amount given to the Catholic Church (and, directly, pati maja ), which is contained in the State Budget. This phase lasted until 1987.

until 1991 occurs the second phase of the path to self-financing. The State establishes a joint budget with a tax allowance (ie, the famous casillita of income in which the individual decides whether to allocate a percentage of your money the Church or not).

The third phase occurs after 1991, it would only produce tax allocation.

This was financed only what people choose to give to the casillitar. But surge "something" a little quite rare: to be effective (?) The State anticipates will account (money, our money) that the Church obtained the previous year, then there is the part obtained by the assignment and what missing (because it received the assignment is less than what has overtaken the church) is what should the Church. But friends, this is not here because: that debt "was targeted "and the general state budget for all these years was scoring a statement that read (pun intended) like this:" They rise to the final down payments. "This means, in plain language for all that: it forgiven.

is, the path to self-funding so far is nothing but a ruse to fool, you are still giving the same money, the same, our pockets to a religious denomination that is NOT for everyone.

And this does not square with the principle of secularism, as the will of the state is to cooperate in a neutral way. Neutral, not giving money.

How solved this story?

Here we come to today. In 2007, the Government makes a pact with the Catholic Church the solution: the state articulates a system that respects the principle of secularism (though it's respectful to be seen) continues funding the tax allowance, but this time without tax exemptions. What are exemptions? Does the Church, besides all that, had exemptions? Yes, it did not pay VAT.

And this willingness of the Government (which, incidentally, was severely criticized by some sectors, such as pp) to what it had? Well basically that VAT is a tax from Europe, and if not paid and the case continued exemption would reach the European Court (aaaaaanda).

is assumed that this form of financing is consistent with the principle of secularism because it is a fully financed with the percentage of each contributor on personal income tax.

But there's more. (Besides the obvious).

As the church lost out of this mess (remember that always we have little money) it was decided to "increase the percentage of tax allocation, passing from 0.5239 to 0.7% "For the poor Church, do not miss much.

The text of the Draft Budget Law 2007, subsequently said that the Church, elevation change, pay the tax. Oh, if they are in everything ... it of the threat of European court has nothing to do, no doubt.

But wait, because there is more, the state is funding the Catholic Church in an indirect way: with exemptions (other non-VAT), activities that the State does not tax, and donations the faithful, the incentives for donations ... In addition to the box.

How is this possible? Really the system of financing with income casillita conforms to the principle of state secularism and equality?

For many yes. But I do not agree. The Church has not reached the famous self-financing, not even seem to have tried it. When something has been removed has been compensated with something else, but why? Does the principle of cooperation that tell us? What we have to pay to the Catholic Church? everything except what is said to be self-financing.

why a percentage for the coffers have to go to the Catholic Church? why does not appear to other faiths? Is not it strange that a state "neutral" can not decide anything on religious affairs, who can not or close the door to all these religions (and cults that are hidden under that name) to obtain legal personality, if I pay for a confession?.
Incidentally, minority religions, too receive direct government funding through a foundation , but only for activities other than worship (integration, cultural, tolerance ...) why are you only receive money for activities outside of worship, but the Church at all?

By the way, I like more this video:

Hamilton Beach Modelo Hb-p90d23al-dj Encender

panic: online journalists do not have protection!

Y I am not referring to Alfonso Rojo and colleagues do not have constitutional protection in Digital Mass Media (I stress with all caps), if not all online journalists of all Media (Again in capital letters, yes) that exist in this universe that is the Internet.

This is, and unfortunately I do not exaggerate, the conclusion drawn from the Judgement of the Criminal Justice Rodriguez Fernandez in court Madrid imposed on the director of Cadena Ser, Daniel Anido and its director Rodolfo Irago Information Services. And that progress from the beginning, has been appealed.

This controversial sentence imposed on convicted one year and nine months imprisonment, suspension from duty and fines of more than 130,000 euros for a crime of secrecy.

things first, seeing this excessive sentence what is that the crime of divulging secrets? Article 197 of the Penal Code provides that in paragraph three that "imprisonment shall be imposed ... if you reveal broadcast or transfer data to third parties ... to relate the above numbers." These data are "reserved for personal or family nature."

As these journalists published on the website of the station (page, let me stress, which normally publishes news) a list with the names of 78 militants affiliated irregularly PP, the judge ( and fiscal course) has found that publishing this information, journalists have committed the crime.

But now it makes sense to think: if this is a clash between two rights, the right of free communication of truthful information to journalists and the confidentiality of the data (privacy? ), the judge must be resolved under the doctrine of constitutional court to balance, and have noticed if it was a news and information of a true (treated in a diligent blablabla ...) to know which of the two rights prevails here. Well, the court itself has recognized that truthful information and the nature of news itself.

So why they have been convicted?

Well-roll of drums, because these reporters did not act to exercise freely their right to communicate truthful information by a broadcast medium (as the well-known Article 20 EC ) because, more drums in the words of the sentence:

"The constitutional protection of the right to information concerning the media social communication -television, radio or newspapers, "but must be qualified that the Internet is not a social media sense, but universal."

Chanáaan! I nternet is not a means of social communication in the strict sense, but universal. Then publish to a website a means of communication, it is published in a media ("comor ?). For gentlemen, future journalists and now, according to the judge: only have constitutional protection professionals working in television, radio and print media. So what happens to all those working in digital media? In the so-called media of the future! For something like garlic and water.

One of two, or all of these professionals live in a parallel world and have not heard that there is online social media - for whom they are working then? What is happening? - Or this man judge needs quickly update. (But wait, just do not know that such things exist).

only remains to say thank goodness that this gentleman does not work in the Constitutional Court (final safeguard our fundamental rights and creator of doctrine), but neither is that in the latter body are very updated, but that deserves another separate post.

Blotchy Hands In Response To Water

interview the officer who arrested the Greenpeace activists

In recent days we have witnessed first arrest and subsequent jail sentence Greenpeace activists sneak into a feast for to show some banners criticizing the actions of politicians in the Copenhagen Climate Summit and the recent release. In this video, the organization shows the making of the action that led to this situation.

The director of Greenpeace Spain Juantxo López de Uralde has given many statements in which he criticized the harsh treatment received in Denmark.

In Puestomadostazas we decided to interview the Chief of Police in charge of detention for getting to know their opinion and to explain the reasons for the treatment of activists.

P-Why Juantxo arrested and his companions?

R-Bah, can not you see it? Slipped into the private party, a dinner made for world leaders, and they arrived, looking like that ...

P-You mean you were the pints what motivated him?

R-No, well yes and no. Obviously what they did was enough to sneak in detention. But with that expensive, I would have stopped at any time.

P-The slip was enough to arrest, "but also for his subsequent imprisonment and isolation for twenty days?

R 'Look, these people are just troublemakers, if Denmark does not want to fill with scum like that we had to give a good lesson. For my part would still be in jail.

P-Just give lessons against rioters is something they do very well ... you

R-We confine ourselves to defend the order, and if for that we need to go out and arrest anyone suspected we will.

P-There are several videos that show all those arbitrary arrests.

R-"Arbitrary arrests? "Arbitrary arrests? Ay Jamie, who know little are preventive arrests, three words: pre-ven-tive. The laws protect us, can arrest anyone committing a crime pint. Thus, in case.

P "Some people, legal experts consider that such arrests are against the rights of persons, personal freedom of the individual ...

R-" Freedom? "Rights?, Nonsense! Want security? With all these people protesting the climate, without such preventive detention could have skipped all the air!

P-Does not it seem a little paranoid all that ...?

R-"Paranoid? Who? Mmmm you're too against the arrests, hey, look what I call the riot! Police, to me!

P-Err ... no, calm down, please. Returning to the issue of greenpeace activists, why do you think are dangerous?

R-Very dangerous! All these people are like terrorists, we must silence them on time.

Q.

silence them? Why?

R-scream a lot, noisy, sneak into parties, put posters horrific that stain our clean cities.

P-They just asked to do something against global warming.

R-Warming ... what? Ah, you mean climate change, look at all those are lies, tales ...

Q. And what about that time of the videos and campaigns as they have done those InspirAction?

R-Nonsense! All these gave me FEEL. Mariconada Menuda video! Where do these people live? I'll stop them all now!

P-So, you believe that there is climate change, then why make a summit?

R-So shut up all those troublemakers, and for the group photo, which is really nice, and then posted on the facebook. Warming does not exist, the CO2 is good, pollution is good. Look nice, I'll put a sample Do you like brunette get in summer?

P-Em, well, yes ...

R-Do you see? As with pollution with all those layers just bad in heaven

P-You mean the ozone layer?

R-That, and so the rays can pass more easily and you get dark earlier, are all advantages! That bunch of ignorant ... if I get upset just thinking about it, all to jail!. I'm from there that it looks like a troublemaker, I'll stop. Come here! You! Come, you locked saw that with those dreadlocks have every bit the look of going to plant a bomb.

interviewed
photo:

New York Temporary Visitor Drivers License

floats for everyone! rides indoctrinated and policies here

Today I could not resist writing about the parade of kings, a beautiful day, a time that all children, atheists and Christians of any denomination (because after all, and this is true, what matters is not that some men visited the infant Jesus, but it will rise the next day with a lot gifts under the tree), living with so much hope that Now, even some movements have sought to add and use it for political purposes, to modernize it all, broadcasting his message to smaller, and instead of candy, come home with a predetermined and imposed ideas, it is always cool, why do not you, more in keeping with the religious background of these, our beloved party.

I mean that in the parade of kings of tomorrow will see coaches as "modern" as the movement of the right to life. Thus, in the district of Chamartin in Madrid, the Right to Live platform will participate in the parade with a float of its own, adorned with pretty colors and with single words like "Christmas" children "and" life. " I'm not going to get into the typical theme that the PP is the one who allowed, and that the PSOE is now kicking for it to be removed, because we know why they do what they do, and the typical "you more" us knows everybody. I find most interesting have been the justification for introducing this float in the parade.

oir.org Become President, Ignacio Asuag, has defended against future criticism, saying that "if the Gay Pride allow coaches to lead this group, in Cavalcade, which symbolizes the protection of mothers and children, should enable us to take our coach. "

Although now I find that the kings cablagata symbolizes the protection of mothers and children, is actually unclear whether these patients claiming perverse and unnatural activities can have a day where you say it proud you are of your condition, why these pro can not tell children that abortion is wrong? Why can not break into a festival especially dedicated to them at this time in which they are protagonists and indoctrinate them against the death of Nonac? If at the end After all, freedom of expression protects them ...

The only small and subtle differences between the gay pride float, and float in the parade of pro Magi are two: that does not attack gay pride the right of heterosexuals or restrict it, and that is not done at a time and before an audience as innocent and in theory, non-political as children. But a float that attack the right decision for women and is made in a cavalcade theoretically apolitical and, again, for children, it is not important.

In this ride, in which the children will get a few dolls of fetuses or plates with red hearts that say "yes to life" instead of candy, maybe, and just maybe, if we, we could also enjoy gay pride floats, by that which they named and justify them, or floats in defense of the Sahara, or the defense of the lives of all those living in the Gaza Strip (which although they are not fetuses, they also enjoy that right), or for example, against the Bulls .

For my part, I like the idea of \u200b\u200bfreedom of expression to the end no matter that the ride is for children, or that the tension from getting on your happiness, I propose a coach, in which single words appear as "children" abused "cures" "homophobic" "condoms," "Africa" \u200b\u200b"discrimination" "women." But all beautiful colors well, so that kids will look as cool as the other. Because we are willing to come to this floats for everyone!

What Is Etha Cetaphil

want you to be truly autonomous ...

Eat just go to the toilet, dressing and undressing, get out of bed and cover when we Domir ... is to be autonomous? Yes, but not enough. Maybe he could live just ... with supervision. But be autonomous is something else. When you know what to choose, when you can say yes or no ... if something is appropriate or not. When not depend on the mood of another in order to feel good (there are many people that this happens.) When you have work, when you have health, when you find what you love. When you do not care what people think ... (Eg you do not mind that your sisters will have disguised jajaj year-end).

God willing, someday I might be totally autonomous. TE VOY A TOMI HELP!. I swear I will spare me!

Funny Baby Situations

The prevailing idea is that you have more weight ...

Best Inline Skates For Pavement

January 2: Taking the City of Granada. Fiestas del Corpus

Spain met seven centuries of Muslim rule. During this time, the northern Christian kingdoms had been hostile to the Arabs, and in the last two years had started a strong process of conquest that had caused the fall of Cordoba and Seville in the thirteenth century. The conquest of Granada went on to become the final campaign of the Muslim kingdom. The Catholic monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella, were about to be conquered for the Christian hosts the last Arab stronghold in the peninsula.

Granada
warfare between the Christians and Muslims was inevitable since 1479. Fernando Aragon was married to Isabel de Castilla a decade ago when both were teenagers. In 1474 Elizabeth's brother died, Henry IV, and the Civil War divided the peninsula for five years. Isabel won in 1479, just the year in which Ferdinand became king of Aragon, Sicily and Naples.

The Catholic Monarchs had strong religious convictions, so the idea of \u200b\u200blaunching a crusade against the Muslim invader was something that had very in mind. Isabella and Ferdinand just needed an excuse to declare war on the Moor. And the truth he did not take too long to find it.

Religion was a of the main reasons. Castile and Aragon in wealth and population surpassed the kingdom of Granada, although many military volunteers arrived in Granada from Morocco across the Strait of Gibraltar. But this flow is cut off just at the time when the Portuguese took over the African side of the Strait in 1413, which the Moroccan decreased.

The marriage of Ferdinand and Isabella had rejoined the English kingdoms forgotten his crusade against Muslims. The fall of Constantinople in 1453 also played an important role as Christians sought to compensate this loss to the Turks. From Rome, the pope gave the plan its full support to English.
Since the fall of Cordoba, Granada had been forced to pay tribute to Castile. The emirs of Granada refused to pay for a few years, and this became one of the main reasons for war. However, the spark of light definitely ended December 26, 1481, when troops from Granada, in retaliation for raids on the English border, took the fortress of Zahara in a daring night raid, carried slavery to the inhabitants of people.

The Spaniards beat two months later, attacking the castle of Alhama, and in Granada. The war had begun. Granada took the initiative in war. Fernando, where attempt to take the Muslim fortress of Loja in July 1482, finally defeated, also suffering the death of Grand Master of the Order of Calatrava. In turn, the troops of the emir Abu el Hassan, crushed the Grand Master of Santiago in the mountains of Malaga.
Jealous of his father's victory in Malaga, Prince Boabdil, Mohammed future XII, directed against a English force based in Lucena. Boabdil was ambushed and captured. Make peace with the English, was able to return home quickly, and once there, start a civil war against his father.

After a series of border incursions, Fernando returned to the offensive in 1485. His forces began to besiege a castle after another. Meanwhile, Abu el Hassan died, taking his reign his brother Al Zagal, who continued the civil war against Boabdil. Boabdil finally swore loyalty to his uncle, and he gave the command of Loja, who quickly gave Fernando.
In 1487, Fernando achieved another fundamental fact: the capture of Malaga. From there, the English king launched a campaign in the eastern end of Grenada, invaded much of the emirate. Lands and castles of Al Zagal were falling in Christian hands.

the end of 1489 Al Zagal finally gave up the fight and retired to a small mountain village. Boabdil, in a fit, took the control of the kingdom and urged people to resist. Fernando was forced to start the siege of Granada by sea. After 18 months of intense fighting, in January 1492, he entered the city victorious. Boabdil and people had to leave Granada with tears in his eyes.